Stránka 1 z 1

Benchmark DRI driveru v Linuxu

Napsal: pon srp 23, 2004 1:47 pm
od Vykupitel
Toto probehlo dri-mailinglistem. Zaujalo me to tak, zverejnuji tady.

Sestava:

ECS k7s5a pro, Athlon 2400XP. 512 MB PC2100 Ram, onboard sound, IBM G74 monitor, and Maxtor ATA100 drive.

OS Debian Unstable, with the sources.list set to snapshot.debian.net
with a date of 15 Aug 2004. The DRI packages I used are the same ones on my server (CVS checkout from 15 Aug 04 with S3TC and Radeon DynamicPM.)
I shut off most of the services on the machine. rcconf shows klogd, makedev,
and sysklogd as the only services active at boot. The kernel used was
2.6.7-1-k7 from Debian.


Method:

All of the benchmarks were started with X already running. I logged into a
user account, started X with "xinit /usr/X11R6/bin/xterm -- :0" then ran the
benchmarks one after the other.

glxgears - let it run for 1 minute then marked down the highest score

quake2 - s_initsound 0, snd_restart, timedemo 1, map demo1.dm2. Run each
resolution 2x and select the highest score. Used "glx OpenGL" driver.

quake3 - s_initsound 0, snd_restart, timedemo 1, demo four. Run each
resolution 2x and select the highest score.

RTCW - launched with "wolfmp +set sv_cheats 1", s_initsound 0, snd_restart,
timedemo 1, demo checkpoint. Run each resolution 2x and select the highest
score.

Unreal Tournament - launch game, bring up console, "timedemo 1", wait for
second flyby to complete then mark down second score.

X and the games were all configured for 16 bit color.
r_ext_compressed_textures was set to 0.

Cards that didn't work:

Oxygen GMX 2000 96MB (gamma). I tried various BusID values. X would start,
but direct rendering was always disabled.

Diamond Speedstar a90 16MB (savage 4 pro+) Lots of lockups. glxgears gave
this a disappointing 229 fps.

Shuttle Spacewalker 16MB (sis 305) Lots of crashing. Problems with vesafb?
glxgears gave this 337.8 fps.

Rage Pro Turbo (mach64) glxgears works with 181.6 fps, but every other OpenGL
program would crash.

Rage 128 Pro (r128) At 640x480 this one seemed semi-reliable. At 1024x768 it
usually froze. glxgears gave this one 518.6 fps.


Cards that worked (more or less):

Voodoo 5-5500 64MB (tdfx)
glxgears - 1425.6
q2 640x480 - 56.4
q2 800x600 - 51.2
q2 1024x768 - 42.9
q3 640x480 - 95
q3 800x600 - 68
q3 1024x768 - 46.1
rtcw 640x480 - 57.6
rtcw 800x600 - 44.6
rtcw 1024x768 - 32.3
ut 640x480 - 80.79
ut 800x600 - 76.6
ut 1024x768 - 58.11
Notes: Seemed very reliable.

IBM SR9 16MB Savage 4 eXtreme (savage)
glxgears - 569.2
q2 640x480 - 49.4
q2 800x600 - 38.8
q2 1024x768 - 27.1
q3 640x480 - 45.1
q3 800x600 - 34.4
q3 1024x768 - 23.3
rtcw 640x480 - segfault
rtcw 800x600 - segfault
rtcw 1024x768 - segfault
ut 640x480 - 36.8
ut 800x600 - 28.78
ut 1024x768 - 20.6
Notes: The segfault in RTCW seemed to be related to the checkpoint demo.
wolfsp seemed to run fine.

Radeon DDR 32MB (r100)
glxgears - 1123
q2 640x480 - 87.8
q2 800x600 - 74.2
q2 1024x768 - 58.1
q3 640x480 - 114.9
q3 800x600 - 80.9
q3 1024x768 - 53.5
rtcw 640x480 - 85.5
rtcw 800x600 - 63.9
rtcw 1024x768 - 43.7
ut 640x480 - 82.97
ut 800x600 - 76.34
ut 1024x768 - 56.4
Notes: RTCW was substantially slower on the first run. Screen became
corrupted once and was only fixed be a reboot.

Matrox G400 32MB (mga)
glxgears - 1000.2
q2 640x480 - 62.9
q2 800x600 - 52.3
q2 1024x768 - 40.2
q3 640x480 - 65.9
q3 800x600 - 51.4
q3 1024x768 - 36.4
rtcw 640x480 - 42.3
rtcw 800x600 - 33.5
rtcw 1024x768 - 24.7
ut 640x480 - 35.32
ut 800x600 - 30.98
ut 1024x768 - 26.7
Notes: Reliable, looks great. UT suffered from lots of software fallback.

Radeon 8500 AIW 128MB (r200)
glxgears - 2583.4
q2 640x480 - 115
q2 800x600 - 105.4
q2 1024x768 - 88.2
q3 640x480 - 165.3
q3 800x600 - 131.5
q3 1024x768 - 90.6
rtcw 640x480 - 98.4
rtcw 800x600 - 92.2
rtcw 1024x768 - 68
ut 640x480 - 73.74
ut 800x600 - 73.4
ut 1024x768 - 67.14
Notes: Roland's observations about massive slowdown at the end of the UT flyby
are still accurate. Although not tested, the 8500 locks up playing ut2003
and ut2004.

BFG FX5200 Ultra 128MB
glxgears - 3934.8
q2 640x480 - 337.1
q2 800x600 - 312.3
q2 1024x768 - 268.5
q3 640x480 - 219.2
q3 800x600 - 217.6
q3 1024x768 - 203.6
rtcw 640x480 - 108.9
rtcw 800x600 - 108.7
rtcw 1024x768 - 107.7
ut 640x480 - 98.12
ut 800x600 - 98.28
ut 1024x768 - 95.71
Notes:

TNT2 32MB
glxgears - 491.6
q2 640x480 - 83.7
q2 800x600 - 55
q2 1024x768 - 38.9
q3 640x480 - 54.2
q3 800x600 - 34.6
q3 1024x768 - 22.4
rtcw 640x480 - 41.8
rtcw 800x600 - 27.2
rtcw 1024x768 - 17.4
ut 640x480 - 60.14
ut 800x600 - 41.59
ut 1024x768 - 26.31
Notes: Locked up with agpgart. Minor display corruption when switching
resolutions in UT which was cleared up by restarting X.

Radeon 8500 AIW 128MB w/FGLRX
Contant lockups... Totally unusable.

Radeon 9600LE 128MB
glxgears - 753.4
q2 640x480 - 146.2
q2 800x600 - 97.8
q2 1024x768 - 56
q3 640x480 - 133.6
q3 800x600 - 82.8
q3 1024x768 - 45.3
rtcw 640x480 - 95.1
rtcw 800x600 - 67.4
rtcw 1024x768 - 37.7
ut 640x480 - 93.08
ut 800x600 - 72.98
ut 1024x768 - 41.65
Notes: These numbers all represent X running at 32 bit color depth. FGLRX
does not support 16 bit.

RE

Napsal: pon srp 23, 2004 2:18 pm
od Vykupitel
Myslim,ze je tady videt velka prevaha nV v podpore Linuxu jako takoveho, Jejich drivery maji daleko vyssi vykon. Prekvapil me i vykon TDFX driveru, je videt,ze prima spoluprace 3dfx s DRI vyvojarema mela sve plody. Skoda jen,ze od konce roku 2000 na nej nikdo uz nesahl.

Napsal: pát led 27, 2006 12:55 am
od Kayman
hmm, prave som to otestoval..
duron900, 256ram, k7s5a, v3 3500 tv, debian Etch - upgrade pred tyzdnom.

glxgears - 1315,200 fps
ut- 35,17 fps
q3 - 62,2 fps

vsetko v 1024x768 16bit

ten q3 ma teda dost prekvapil. oproti v5 ^^
ale ut zase nic moc :/

Napsal: pát led 27, 2006 1:46 am
od Opty
jen tak mimochodem... :roll:
mtippett píše:...
Now can everybody repeat after me, 'The fps value from glxgears carries NO relevance for anything beyond verifying hardware acceleration. Period.'
...
a kdyby tomu nekdo nerozumel:
http://www.gmpf.de/index.php/NVidia:Basic_Installation píše:...
glxgears is not a benchmark and can not be used to compare machine speed
...
-> google :wink:

Napsal: pát led 27, 2006 10:09 am
od Kayman
:pp:

Napsal: pát led 27, 2006 10:39 am
od Opty
Kayman píše::pp:
ja sem si proste musel rypnout :mrgreen:

Napsal: čtv úno 16, 2006 1:18 am
od lipo
no v5 uz nemam ale situace se od r. 2000 asi nezmenila co ? (support dvou a vice cipu)

Napsal: čtv úno 16, 2006 1:24 am
od Kayman
http://dri.freedesktop.org/wiki/3dfx?action=highlight&value=CategoryHardware píše:SLI is currently not supported. We are looking for volunteers to complete the SLI work. Note that this is quite difficult to complete.
:(